The issue extended its bidding window and priced at the floor of its band. Both facts are public. Neither was widely noticed, and together they point to a gap in what SME applicants are able to see. Harikanta Overseas Limited, a Surat-based manufacturer of synthetic textile fabrics, raised approximately Rs 25.6 crore on the SME […]
The videos showed students celebrating massive profits after joining the course. SEBI checked the same students’ actual trades and found most of them were sitting in losses. That gap between the marketing and the reality cost one academy a Rs 600 crore penalty. Before you pay for the next “mentorship,” run this checklist on the
Sachin purchased a trading advisory plan for ₹63,900. He used it actively for about ten to twelve days, during which he incurred a loss of close to ₹20,000. Facing a temporary shortage of trading capital, he informed the firm honestly that he would need to pause his participation for a while. Rather than treating this
Nitilesh Pawaskar has held SEBI Research Analyst registration INH000004547 since 19 December 2016, and across the seven financial years his own disclosure covers, exactly one complaint appears on the record. That is a genuinely unusual number in this sector, and it deserves saying before anything else. Which makes what follows more interesting rather than less.
One Market Signal holds SEBI Research Analyst registration INH000019044, active since 12 December 2024, and operates under Rohit Yadav from Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh. The registration checks out cleanly against the firm’s own repeated statements across its site. What does not check out as cleanly is a specific line in its refund policy, one that directly
Omkar Thakur has held SEBI Research Analyst registration INH000017532 since 12 July 2024, and operates under the trading brand StockVista. The registration itself checks out cleanly against SEBI’s own published list. What does not check out as cleanly is what happens once you look past the registration number to the pricing page. Four of the
Omkara Capital’s own website states it has had zero complaints on SCORES. Its own mandatory complaint disclosure, published on the same site, records 12 complaints across two financial years. That is not a rounding difference or a reporting period mismatch of the kind that shows up on other firms’ disclosures. It is a plain claim
Omkara Capital Private Limited has held SEBI Research Analyst registration INH000008206 since 23 February 2021, and separately holds Investment Adviser registration INA000016825 since April 2022. That second registration is worth flagging upfront because of how it is structured; since it is not a separate company trading under a similar name, the confusion that shows up
Omniscience Capital Advisors Private Limited holds SEBI Research Analyst registration INH000020077, run alongside an Investment Adviser registration and a Portfolio Manager registration, all under the same company. That structure alone is not unusual. Several firms reviewed on this site hold more than one SEBI licence. What is worth knowing before you go looking for this
Parekh Jaykumar Bipinchandra holds SEBI Research Analyst registration INH000024499 under the brand JK Research Analyst, and the SEBI record shows that the registration began on 29 December 2025. The firm’s own Disclosure Document, published on its website, states a different date entirely: 17 November 2023. That is not a rounding difference or a typo in
Pankaj Garg holds SEBI Research Analyst registration INH000023481, active since 26 September 2025, and operates the trading brand Vriha Research from Jalandhar, Punjab. The registration is genuine, confirmed both on the firm’s own site and on its public Telegram channel bio. What is worth a closer look is the pricing page itself, where one of
Yusuf was persistently contacted by a broker’s representative and encouraged to open a trading account, with assurances of guidance and algorithmic trading support built into the pitch. Nowhere in that onboarding conversation was he told about the flat brokerage rate that would apply to every single lot he traded, a fixed charge of fifty rupees
