Recovered ₹90,000 from a Guaranteed Return Scam: A FraudFree Case Study

Quick Summary

Neha Kulkarni (name changed) purchased a premium package that came with a written promise of a fixed monthly return. Her total claim reached 6,60,500. No SEBI registered entity may guarantee investment returns to a client. That single written promise anchored her file, and our team recovered 90,000, a 13.6 percent share.

Neha (name changed) was approached in late 2024 by a SEBI-registered research analyst offering a premium package with an unusually attractive promise: a fixed three percent monthly return. The guarantee was printed clearly in the sales brochure handed to her during an in-person meeting.

She paid ₹1,50,000 to join the highest tier.

For Neha, the appeal was simple: A guaranteed monthly return felt far more reassuring than taking her chances with an uncertain market.

But there was a bigger problem with the promise. SEBI rules do not allow registered research analysts or investment advisers to guarantee returns to clients. Market outcomes cannot be promised in advance, and a fixed return guarantee can be a serious red flag.

For the first few months, the results stayed close to the promised figure. That early success made the guarantee feel genuine and encouraged Neha to put in more money. She eventually upgraded her package twice, taking her total payments to ₹6,60,500.

Then the numbers changed.

During the final quarter, Neha’s returns turned sharply negative. She went back to the analyst with the obvious question: what happened to the guaranteed return mentioned in the brochure? Instead of addressing the shortfall, the analyst stopped responding to her messages.

That is what made the brochure so important. A promise that appears accurate for several months can easily feel like proof that the strategy works. In Neha’s case, it became the very reason she trusted the analyst enough to commit substantially more money.

Fortunately, Neha had kept the original physical brochure from the in-person meeting. She had not received it digitally, but keeping the document preserved the clearest evidence of what had actually been promised.

With our team’s assistance, Neha pursued the matter through counselling and ultimately recovered ₹90,000.

SEBI SCORES complaint outcome showing successful ₹90,000 fee recovery settlement
Official SEBI SCORES dispute resolution confirming the successful ₹90,000 settlement recovered by Fraud Free

How We Turned Neha’s Brochure Into Key Evidence?

We started with the one piece of evidence that was hardest to explain away: the original brochure promising a fixed monthly return.

Instead of making the case about whether Neha’s trades performed well or badly, we focused on the promise itself and what the rules say about it.

Step 1: Preserve the Guarantee

We pulled out the exact wording from the brochure that promised a fixed monthly return. That document became the starting point of the complaint because it showed precisely what had been presented to Neha.

Step 2: Show When the Promise Fell Apart

We compared the promised return with Neha’s actual account performance month by month. Once the losses began, the difference between what was promised and what happened became impossible to overlook.

Step 3: Connect the Promise to SEBI Rules

We then pointed to the SEBI provisions restricting registered entities from guaranteeing returns to clients. This kept the argument focused on the guarantee itself, rather than getting lost in a debate over market performance.

Step 4: Put the Brochure First in the SEBI SCORES Complaint

Our complaint through the SEBI SCORES portal opened with the written guarantee and supporting documents. The objective was simple: make the key issue immediately visible instead of burying it under pages of trading history.

The analyst later argued that the brochure was merely marketing material and not a formal commitment.

We countered that the concern was not whether the brochure created a contractual promise, but whether a registered entity could make such a return guarantee in the first place.

Step 5: Stand by the Evidence During Escalation

With the written guarantee clearly documented, we continued the matter through SCORES and responded to the analyst’s explanations.

By keeping the discussion centred on the regulatory issue rather than subjective trading results, we created a stronger basis for settlement discussions.

Case Result: ₹90,000 Successfully Recovered

The written guarantee proved to be a clear and undeniable breach once reviewed. Neha recovered ₹90,000 of her ₹6,60,500 claim, a 13.6 percent share.

The lower recovery reflects that most of her claim traced to market losses on invested funds rather than the fee itself. The case closed within fifteen weeks.

Were You Promised Guaranteed Returns by a SEBI Registered Entity?

Under SEBI regulations, no research analyst or advisor can legally promise fixed monthly returns.

If you have written proof or brochures promising fixed gains, FraudFree Team can build your case.

Register with us now.

Conclusion

Neha’s case shows why a guaranteed return should never be treated as a harmless sales promise. The early results made the guarantee look credible, but the written promise became crucial once the losses appeared.

For investors, brochures, messages, invoices, and other sales documents can become important evidence when a dispute arises.

Even if the promised returns were delivered for a few months, that does not make an improper guarantee acceptable.

If an advisor has promised you a fixed return, save the proof before you challenge the claim.


Report. Recover. Stay Fraud Free.


 

Frequently Asked Questions

No. Guaranteeing returns is prohibited for every SEBI registered research analyst and investment adviser, regardless of how the promise is phrased.

Most of her claim reflected trading losses on invested capital rather than fees paid, which typically results in a smaller recovery share.

A written guarantee, like a brochure or message, is stronger evidence, but a documented verbal promise through chat or recording can still support a complaint.

Treat it as a warning sign rather than a benefit. No legitimate registered entity can lawfully make that promise.

loader

FraudFree Support

We're online — reply instantly
Scroll to Top