Quick Summary
Trade Nexus Research’s complaint tables have real gaps, its monthly disclosure only covers part of the period its annual table reports on. Its Google rating sits at 3.7 stars, and four detailed reviews underneath describe serious problems, including one alleging a refused refund after a significant loss. None of what’s below has been independently verified. It’s reported here as what real users say on a public platform, not established fact.
A 3.7-star average sounds middling, not alarming.
It’s what’s written underneath that rating on Trade Nexus Research’s Google listing that actually tells the fuller story.
Four detailed, recent reviews sit there, each describing a different angle on what appears to be the same underlying problem.
This page works through those reviews alongside the firm’s complaint disclosure.
Registration and the full pricing breakdown, including why two plans sit at exactly the SEBI limit, are covered separately on our Trade Nexus Research page.
What Do Trade Nexus Research’s Complaint Tables Actually Show?
Every SEBI-registered Research Analyst has to publish how many complaints it gets and what happened to each one.
Here’s what the tables actually show, and where the coverage falls short.
The Annual Disposal Trend
| Year | Received | Resolved | Pending |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-25 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| 2025-26 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 2026-27 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 3 | 3 | 0 |
Three complaints since registration, all resolved. That’s a genuinely light record, worth reading plainly.
The Monthly Trend Doesn’t Cover the Full Period
The monthly table only shows one complaint, received and resolved in September 2025, matching the FY2025-26 figure above.
The two complaints attributed to FY2024-25 don’t appear anywhere in the monthly table at all, since that table’s coverage window doesn’t reach back that far.
The monthly rows also aren’t listed in a clean chronological order; April through August 2026 appear first, followed by September 2025 through March 2026 afterward.
None of this points to anything improper by itself.
It does mean the monthly table alone doesn’t give you the complete picture, and it’s worth asking Trade Nexus Research directly for a fuller, properly dated history if the recent complaint record matters to your decision.
The Current Snapshot
| Source | Received | Resolved | Avg. Resolution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Directly from Investors | 1 | 1 | 8 days |
| SEBI SCORES | 0 | 0 | N/A |
| Other Sources | 0 | 0 | N/A |
One complaint, resolved in 8 days. No details are given on what the complaint was actually about.
What Are Google Reviewers Saying About Trade Nexus Research?
Trade Nexus Research holds a 3.7-star rating on Google.
Four detailed reviews sit underneath that average, each describing a different aspect of the same broad concern.
1. A Reviewer Describes Good Results Before Payment, Then a Decline After
One reviewer describes paying ₹30,000 for three months, saying they’d seen profits before subscribing but experienced consistently unhelpful recommendations afterward, and states the team never processed a refund.
2. A Reviewer Describes Inexperienced Traders and Consistent Losses
A second reviewer describes the traders as seeming inexperienced and lacking confidence in their own calls, stating most recommendations resulted in losses.
They paid ₹25,000 for three months and describe no meaningful support or accountability once payment was made.
3. A Reviewer Describes Rapid, Unmanageable Trade Calls and a Capital Loss
A third reviewer describes being added to a group where calls were often executed within a minute of being posted, leaving little time to act.
They describe losing roughly ₹4,000 in capital over two days, on top of a month’s subscription fee, and state that promised step-by-step support never materialised.
4. A Reviewer Uses Strong Language and Describes a Refused Refund After a Large Loss
A fourth reviewer describes paying approximately ₹1 lakh, experiencing a significant capital loss, and being told nothing could be done when a refund was requested.
This review uses strong language to describe the firm and states that screenshots were attached to support the account.
We’re reporting only that this review exists and describes these events. We aren’t repeating the specific accusatory language as our own characterisation, and we haven’t independently verified any of it. No SEBI order confirms these claims as of this writing.
If you believe you have direct, relevant knowledge here, the right step is a formal SEBI complaint, not further discussion in reviews.
The Pattern Worth Noticing Across These Reviews
Four separate reviewers, writing independently, describe a broadly similar shape: encouraging results before payment, a decline afterward, and difficulty getting support or a refund once money has changed hands.
That consistency is worth taking seriously, separate from whether every individual detail in each review can be confirmed.
A single account of a bad experience can be dismissed as one unhappy customer.
Four, describing the same basic pattern independently, are harder to write off that way.
Also Read: Stratzy Reviews where users rated 1-star and reported similar difficulties while exiting subscriptions.
How to File a Complaint Against Trade Nexus Research?
A written, dated record of exactly what happened carries far more weight than a general complaint that the service was disappointing.
Start with the firm itself, at the RA’s email ID.
Name the specific amount you paid and the specific outcome you were promised.
No real response, or one that doesn’t take your concern seriously, is what the SEBI SCORES complaint portal exists for.
That’s where a grievance against a Research Analyst actually gets logged with the regulator.
A SCORES complaint that stalls moves next to the SMART ODR registration platform, bringing a neutral party into the dispute directly.
And where even that doesn’t resolve things, Share Market Arbitration is the stage that ends with a ruling neither side can simply ignore.
None of these stages skip ahead of each other, and our guide on how to file a complaint against SEBI registered research analyst walks through exactly how they connect.
Asked for a refund and told there’s nothing that can be done?
We help you document exactly what happened and put your case on record in a form the firm actually has to respond to. Register with us for a free look at your situation.
Disclaimer
This page is based on Trade Nexus Research’s own complaint disclosure and public reviews, reported but not independently verified.
No SEBI order stands against the firm as of this writing. Treat this page as research, not legal advice.
Conclusion
Trade Nexus Research’s complaint tables show a light record: three complaints since registration, all resolved, though the monthly disclosure doesn’t cover the full period its own annual table reports on.
Its Google rating sits at 3.7 stars, with four detailed reviews underneath describing a similar pattern: encouraging results before payment, followed by losses and difficulty getting support or a refund afterward.
If you’re weighing this firm, read the reviews above in full, and don’t treat the star rating alone as the complete picture.
Report. Recover. Stay Fraud Free.
Frequently Asked Questions
Three since registration in July 2024, all resolved. The monthly disclosure only covers part of that period, so the fuller history sits in the annual table.
No. It's an account from a single public review. No SEBI order or other regulatory finding confirms it as of this writing.
3.7 stars, with several detailed negative reviews sitting underneath that average.
Yes. Several independently written reviews describe good early results followed by losses, and difficulty getting support or a refund once payment was made.
That's covered in full on our separate Trade Nexus Research page, including why two of its plans sit at exactly the SEBI fee limit.
Add us as a preferred source on Google »
