Quick Summary
Seema Jain holds SEBI Research Analyst registration INH100006667, active since December 2018, operating as Stock Pro from DLF Phase-4, Gurgaon. Her own website states three different figures for her market experience across three separate pages: five years, fifteen years and twenty-plus years. The Master Trader Course is priced against a “total value” of ₹2,09,992, with no breakdown of how that figure was calculated, and research plans require a minimum capital of ₹10 lakh to ₹20 lakh just to be eligible. Her complaint disclosure carries an internal date inconsistency, and her Google listing shows a 4.5-star average across 190 reviews sitting above several detailed, named accounts worth reading in full.
Seema Jain holds SEBI Research Analyst registration INH100006667, active since 14 December 2018, running Stock Pro from Gurgaon, Haryana.
The registration checks out. What doesn’t line up cleanly is her own website’s account of her own experience, and what her complaint tables and independent reviews add up to once you read past the headline numbers.
This page covers the registration, that experience inconsistency, the pricing structure and its unexplained comparison value, the seven courses listed as free, the marketing language worth a second look, the complaint data, and every named Google review available.
Seema Jain Research Analyst Review
Stock Pro describes itself as a stock market education platform, running since 2018.
It offers free educational resources alongside StockPro Premium Courses covering technical and fundamental analysis.
Its research plans are branded Premium Equity & F&O Research Service, sold in 3-month and 6-month terms only.
Coverage spans short-term, swing and positional trading, alongside longer-term investment strategies, focused primarily on stocks, futures and options.
Social media icons for Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Telegram and YouTube appear on the site.
Several don’t lead to active, verifiable profiles.
The team is described as including qualified CAs, analysts, mentors and trainers, with technical analysis, moving averages and candlestick reading named as core areas of expertise.
No individual team members beyond Seema Jain herself are named anywhere on the site, which makes it difficult to check who, specifically, is delivering any given live session or class.
Beyond the research plans, the site lists several free-to-attend course modules, alongside the paid Master Trader Course as the flagship offering.
None of this establishes wrongdoing.
Where conduct genuinely crosses a line, the escalation route is covered further down this page.
Is Seema Jain SEBI Registered?
Yes. INH100006667 is confirmed directly on Stock Pro’s own compliance page.
| Detail | Information |
| Name | Seema Jain |
| SEBI Registration Number | INH100006667 |
| BSE Enlistment No. | 5320 |
| Validity | 14 December 2018, Perpetual |
| Registered Address | No. 7301, 2nd Floor, DLF Phase-4, Gurgaon, Haryana 122009 |
| Correspondence Address | Y-67, Regency Park 2, Near Super Mart 1, DLF City Phase 4, Gurgaon, Haryana 122009 |
The INH prefix marks a Research Analyst. It permits research and recommendations to a subscriber base. It does not permit personalised advice, trade execution, or portfolio management.
Stock Pro’s own compliance page separately confirms the BSE enlistment number, 5320, and names Seema Jain as both the compliance officer and grievance officer for the registration, meaning one person holds all three roles.
If you have landed here and want to know more about the registration and SEBI Order linked to it, read our blog: Is Seema Jain SEBI registered?
Why Does Seema Jain’s Site State Three Different Experience Figures?
Her own registered-analyst page implies roughly five years, consistent with a 2018 registration.
Her About Us page states fifteen years.
A separate course page states “Trading Experience of 20+ Years.”
These aren’t close variations. They’re three different numbers on pages she controls.
Before treating any credential claim on the site as settled, confirm the specific figure directly with her in writing.
The same About Us page also states she holds a Ph.D. from IIT Delhi.
That credential isn’t something this page can independently confirm or dispute, and it’s listed here only as a claim the site makes, not a verified fact.
Seema Jain Research Analyst Pricing and the ₹1,51,000 SEBI Fee Cap
The research plans themselves stay under the ceiling.
A Research Analyst may charge a maximum of ₹1,51,000 per annum per family for individual and HUF clients who aren’t accredited investors.
The Published Research Pricing
| Plan | Duration | Price, GST Included | Base Price |
|---|---|---|---|
| Premium Equity & F&O | 3 Months | ₹29,999 | ₹25,422 |
| Premium Equity & F&O | 6 Months | ₹54,999 | ₹46,609 |
Annualised, even the 3-month plan renewed four times comes to roughly ₹1,01,688 base. Both plans stay comfortably under the SEBI cap.
No Monthly Option Exists
Only 3-month and 6-month terms are offered. The minimum advertised commitment is ₹29,999, with no lower entry point.
A client testing the service for a single month has no way to do so at a lower cost.
The choice is effectively between a three-month commitment or nothing.
Minimum Capital Requirement Is Separate From The Fee
Subscribing requires ₹10,00,000 in equity capital or ₹20,00,000 for F&O, described as own funds only.
This isn’t a fee. It’s a stated eligibility bar that limits who can actually use the research once purchased, and it’s worth confirming exactly how that figure is verified before you pay.
Seven Courses Are Listed As “Free,” Each Against A Struck-through Fee
Beyond the Master Trader Course, the site lists seven modules, including an All-in-One Trading Course, a Commodity Course, a Positional Trading Course, and a Risk & Trade Management Course.
Each carries a struck-through fee, ranging from ₹9,999 to ₹29,999, with “(FREE)” displayed next to every single one.
If every listed course is actually free regardless of the struck-through figure, those figures aren’t real prices being discounted.
They’re comparison numbers with nothing behind them.
Ask directly whether any of these seven modules ever genuinely cost the struck-through amount, or whether “free” is simply how they’ve always been offered.
Course Pricing Carries An Unexplained Comparison Figure
The Master Trader Course is marketed against a stated “total value” of ₹2,09,992, reduced to ₹44,999.
Nowhere does the site explain how the ₹2,09,992 figure was calculated, or what specifically makes up that total.
Ask directly what the comparison value represents before treating the discount as real savings.
Also Read: Equity Edge Research Analyst who crossed SEBI fee cap under a “training” tag.
What Marketing Language on Seema Jain’s Website Needs a Closer Look?
A few claims are worth checking independently rather than taken at face value.
1. Specific Stock Picks Used As Promotional Proof
Third-party coverage cites specific buy recommendations, including ATGL at 390, AAVAS Finance at 650, and Tata Elxsi at 1,900, describing them as recent multibagger stocks.
Naming specific historical winners is a selective sample.
It says nothing about calls that didn’t work out, and none of the coverage reviewed for this page lists a losing recommendation alongside the winning ones.
The same coverage describes her general approach as finding stocks “hidden from the public eye” with multibagger potential, language that leans toward outcome promises rather than a description of research methodology.
2. Large, Uncorroborated Audience Figures
The site claims 10,000+ members, 5,000+ members trained, and 500+ videos published.
Some of this is independently checkable.
Her Facebook page shows roughly 197,000 likes, which is a real, verifiable figure and does support an active public following.
Other channels are cited too, including a stated 250,000+ Telegram following and over 1,000 published YouTube videos.
These are large numbers for an individual analyst’s public reach, and they’re worth weighing separately from the training-outcome claims below them.
The training-outcome numbers, specifically the 10,000+ members trained figure, aren’t independently verifiable from the site alone.
3. Performance-Oriented Course Language
The course promotion describes a proprietary screener that finds “potential performing stocks” and aims for “high-probability trades with small stop-losses and large targets.”
Language framed this way sets a specific outcome expectation that a research service can’t actually guarantee.
4. A Five-Year Gap The Site Itself Seems To Have Missed
The registration became active in 2018.
One page still describes the analyst as having “5+ years” of experience, a figure that hasn’t been updated in step with the rest of the site’s other claims.
That gap, on its own, suggests parts of the site simply haven’t been revised recently, separate from the larger three-way inconsistency covered above.
None of this means the underlying research is unreliable.
It means the site’s own self-description hasn’t been kept consistent, which is worth factoring in when weighing any other claim it makes.
Seema Jain Research Analyst Reviews
Stock Pro’s Google listing carries a 4.5-star average across 190 reviews, and underneath that headline number sit several detailed, named accounts worth reading in full.
A high average built on a large number of reviews doesn’t rule out a genuine cluster of unresolved, specific complaints sitting within it.
The complaint data below is the firm’s own regulatory record, filed under SEBI’s disclosure requirements.
The Google reviews are independent accounts from people who paid for the course or research service, posted on a platform the firm doesn’t control.
Read together, they give a fuller picture than either alone.
Does Stock Pro’s Complaint Data Add Up?
The firm’s two complaint disclosures report the same single recent complaint in different months, creating a clear inconsistency in the published data.
The Detailed Table
| Source | Pending Last Month | Received | Resolved | Total Pending | Avg. Resolution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Directly from Investors | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | N/A |
| SEBI (SCORES) | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 10 days |
| Other Sources | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | N/A |
| Grand Total | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 10 days |
This table is titled “Data for the month ending March 2026.”
Monthly Trend Places The Same Complaint Elsewhere
The monthly disposal table shows zero activity in March 2026.
It shows 1 complaint received and resolved in December 2025 instead.
These two tables describe the same single complaint, and they disagree on which month it happened in.
The detailed table also hasn’t been refreshed since March 2026, despite the monthly trend running through August 2026, a gap of roughly five months where the site’s two complaint sources simply stopped agreeing with each other.
The Annual Picture
| Year | Received | Resolved |
|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | 1 | 1 |
| 2021-22 | 2 | 2 |
| 2024-25 | 4 | 4 |
| 2025-26 | 1 | 1 |
| Grand Total | 8 | 8 |
Eight complaints since 2018, all marked resolved, none pending.
That’s a real number worth stating plainly, and it’s worth crediting that every one shows as closed, over a registration that has now run close to eight years.
Complaint volume did rise over time, from 1 in FY2019-20 to 4 in FY2024-25.
That trend alone doesn’t say anything about what those complaints concerned, since none of the tables describe the nature of any individual complaint.
What Do Google Reviewers Say About Stock Pro?
Five detailed 1-star reviews sit underneath the 4.5-star average. Each raises a different, specific concern.
1. A Detailed Account Describing Session Attendance And Delayed Updates
One reviewer, posting under the account name Sambhav, describes attending live sessions where Seema Jain joined late, without sharing her screen, and states that performance updates weren’t posted promptly when stop losses were hit.
The same review separately alleges that recommendations were sometimes acted on before being shared with the group, a concern that would fall under SEBI’s own rules on fair and timely disclosure if substantiated.
We’re reporting only that this allegation exists in a public review. We haven’t verified it, and no SEBI order confirms it as of this writing.
A prospective client cannot resolve a claim like this from a review alone, and this page will not speculate further on it.
If you believe you have direct, relevant knowledge here, the appropriate step is a formal complaint through SEBI, not further discussion in reviews.
The same review also describes negative comments being deleted and the reviewer being blocked from the account’s YouTube channel, stating that only positive comments remain visible in the video comment sections.
The reviewer separately questions whether the analyst’s own team personally trades based on the recommendations given to subscribers.
2. A Reviewer Who Didn’t Receive The Personal Mentoring Described To Them
A second reviewer, posting as brooklyn zeus, states they were told they’d be taught directly and didn’t receive that, describing the mentor as too busy to take a promised class.
The reviewer states that SEBI registration alone doesn’t guarantee an analyst will actually teach a class.
The account owner posted a reply beginning “Hi brooklyn zeus,” though the full response wasn’t captured for this review.
3. A Reviewer Describing An Absence Of Structured Curriculum
A third reviewer, Rubaganesh S, describes the course as lacking a curated syllabus for stock trading and advises against spending money on it.
4. A Reviewer Describing ₹36,000 Spent With No Practical Instruction
A fourth reviewer, Swathi Rao, states they paid roughly ₹36,000 and describes the course as not covering practical trading or hedging concepts, and recommends free YouTube content as a better alternative.
5. A Reviewer Describing Content Freely Available Elsewhere, And Being Banned For Criticism
A fifth reviewer, Abhijeet Agharkar, states the course teaches material freely available on YouTube, and describes being banned from the group after posting a negative comment.
The review includes screenshots of a WhatsApp exchange with the firm’s support account.
A pattern worth naming plainly across these five accounts: several independently describe negative comments being removed and critical members being blocked.
That’s a consistent enough thread across unrelated reviewers to be worth asking the firm about directly, separate from whether any individual review’s other claims are accurate, and separate from the front-facing 4.5-star average the reviews sit underneath.
Also Read: Goldman Sachs India shows how a firm that a single person does not run can have a complaint record.
What Does Seema Jain’s Telegram Promotion Show?
A Telegram post promoting the Master Trader Course cites a specific trade in Raymond Ltd, shared on 3 August 2026, above 598, later reaching a high of 1,099.
The post states this as an “83.77% upmove” and uses the figure directly to promote course enrollment.
One highlighted result doesn’t represent a full track record.
Ask for the complete run of calls over a stated period before judging the service from a single post, and check whether the post discloses any calls that didn’t reach their target.
What Does The Homepage Testimonial Say?
A testimonial from a user named Praveen Sinha states they “made ₹10,000 in first week.”
We’re reporting what this testimonial states on the firm’s own site. We haven’t independently verified it, and no context is given on the platform used, the strategy followed, or the capital risked to reach that figure.
What Should You Check Before Enrolling With Seema Jain?
Ask which specific experience figure- five, fifteen, or twenty years- is actually current, and get it confirmed in writing.
Ask for the exact breakdown behind the ₹2,09,992 comparison value before treating the course discount as genuine.
Confirm whether the minimum capital requirement, ₹10 lakh for equity or ₹20 lakh for F&O, is checked before or after payment, and get that in writing too.
If a specific stock pick is used to sell you on the service, ask to see the full run of calls over the same period, not just the ones that worked, and ask who specifically will be teaching or delivering the session you’re paying for.
How to File a Complaint Against Seema Jain?
If your own experience matches any pattern above, particularly around comment moderation or delayed updates, a written, dated record gives you firmer ground.
Send your grievance to the RA’s email, describing what you were told, what you paid, and what you want resolved.
Reference specific dates and sessions where you can.
Keep that record regardless of the response, since it’s the foundation for any escalation that follows.
If it isn’t resolved, escalation runs through specific channels.
- File on the SEBI SCORES complaint portal. This is the formal first step for raising the matter through the regulatory grievance mechanism.
- Move to conciliation through the SMART ODR portal. This provides a structured route to seek resolution between the parties.
- Where that fails, share market arbitration produces a binding award. This provides a further formal mechanism when the earlier process does not resolve the dispute.
For the full process, see our guide to filing a complaint against a SEBI-registered research analyst.
Told A Negative Comment Would Get You Blocked?
We document the pattern directly and put it on record in a form the firm has to respond to. Register with us for a free read on your situation.
Disclaimer
This page is based on Stock Pro’s own published material and public Google reviews, reported but not independently verified, and alleges no wrongdoing since no SEBI order exists against the firm.
Verify all details at the source before acting. This is research, not legal advice.
Conclusion
Seema Jain’s SEBI registration, INH100006667, is genuine and active since 2018.
Her own site states three different experience figures across three pages, and her flagship course is priced against a comparison value nobody explains.
Her complaint tables disagree on which month her single recent complaint actually occurred in, and her Google reviews carry a 4.5-star average alongside five detailed 1-star accounts describing unresolved course issues and, in one case, a serious unverified allegation about trade timing.
Before enrolling in anything, get the actual experience claim, the course value breakdown, and the complaint history confirmed in writing.
Report. Recover. Stay Fraud Free.
Frequently Asked Questions
Yes, registered to Seema Jain since December 2018, perpetual. Confirm directly on SEBI's own register.
Her own site states three different figures on three separate pages. Ask her directly which one is current before relying on any of them.
No. Both the 3-month and 6-month plans stay well under ₹1,51,000 annualised.
No, it's a separate eligibility condition, ₹10 lakh for equity or ₹20 lakh for F&O, on top of whatever plan you pay for.
Her annual disclosure shows 8 since 2018, all marked resolved. Her two complaint tables disagree on which month the most recent one occurred in.
Add us as a preferred source on Google »
