Quick Summary
Research Samrat Insights Pvt Ltd is a SEBI registered Research Analyst carrying INH000022428, active since August 2025 and based in Navi Mumbai. Its own Terms of Service state the correct SEBI fee ceiling, ₹1,51,000 per annum per family. Its own pricing page then charges ₹1,77,000 a year for its Basic Plan, above the exact limit its own terms describe. Its current complaint summary and its detailed monthly trend describe August 2026 differently, arriving at the same ending total through two different sets of figures. Complaint volume has also risen sharply, from 6 in its first partial financial year to 15 already in the next.
Research Samrat Insights Pvt Ltd holds SEBI Research Analyst registration, active since 5 August 2025, based in Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra.
The registration is genuine. What is not consistent is the firm’s own documentation.
Its Terms of Service correctly state the SEBI fee ceiling of ₹1,51,000 per annum per family.
Its own pricing page then charges more than that for its Basic Plan, a direct conflict between two documents published by the same firm.
This page works through the registration, that specific pricing conflict, the firm’s complaint disclosure and a discrepancy inside it, and the marketing and privacy language worth a second look.
Research Samrat Insights Review
Research Samrat Insights describes itself as offering research-backed market insights and real-time recommendations, covering market strategy, technical and fundamental analysis, weekly research reports, and real-time alerts carrying entry, target, and stop-loss levels.
Its research process is described as covering macro analysis, sector and industry selection, company screening based on fundamental metrics, and Market Profile analysis.
Alerts are delivered through what the site calls the Research Samrat app, along with SMS, WhatsApp and email.
None of this establishes wrongdoing, and nothing further on this page does either.
Where a registered analyst’s conduct does cross a line, the formal escalation route is covered in full further down this page.
Is Research Samrat Insights SEBI Registered?
Yes, and INH000022428 is confirmed independently on SEBI’s own published Research Analyst list.
| Detail | Information |
|---|---|
| Name | Research Samrat Insights Pvt Ltd |
| SEBI Registration Number | INH000022428 |
| Validity | 5 August 2025, Perpetual |
| Registered Address | Office No. 238, 2nd Floor, Rainbow Business Park, Sector-24, Vashi, Thane, Maharashtra 400705 |
| Correspondence Address | Same as registered address |
| Contact Person | Shaikh Abdullah Latif |
| researchsamrat5@gmail |
What the INH Prefix Permits
The INH prefix marks a Research Analyst. It permits publishing research and issuing recommendations to a subscriber base.
It does not permit personalised advice built around an individual client’s income, goals or holdings, trade execution, or portfolio management.
Does Research Samrat Insights’ Own Pricing Match Its Own Stated Fee Cap?
This is the clearest and most direct finding on this page, because it does not require any outside comparison.
The firm’s own two documents disagree with each other.
A Research Analyst may charge a maximum of ₹1,51,000 per annum per family, excluding statutory charges, for individual and HUF clients who are not accredited investors.
The firm’s own Terms of Service states this exact figure, correctly describing the ceiling that applies to its individual and HUF clients.
The Published Price List
| Plan | Duration | Price |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Plan | Monthly, Quarterly, Half Yearly or Yearly | ₹1,77,000 per year |
| Premium Plan, Institutional Client | Annually | ₹50,00,000 per year |
The Basic Plan Breaches The Exact Figure The Firm’s Own Terms Describe
The Basic Plan is priced at ₹1,77,000 a year, ₹26,000 above the ₹1,51,000 ceiling its own Terms of Service state.
This is not a case of annualising a monthly or quarterly price to find a breach.
The yearly price itself, as published, exceeds the limit the firm’s own compliance document says applies.
The pricing page separately lists a quarterly option at ₹44,500. Annualised across four quarters, that comes to ₹1,78,000, landing in essentially the same place as the stated yearly price.
Whichever billing cycle a client chooses, the annual total sits above ₹1,51,000.
The Premium Plan Needs Its Own Context, Not Automatic Alarm
The Institutional Client plan, priced at ₹50,00,000 a year, is dramatically higher than the Basic Plan.
The ₹1,51,000 ceiling applies specifically to individual and HUF clients who are not accredited investors.
It does not apply to genuinely non-individual or institutional clients, who negotiate fees bilaterally.
A price this high is not automatically a violation, provided it is genuinely being sold only to non-individual or accredited clients.
If you are an individual investor and this plan, or anything resembling it, is offered to you, ask directly which client category you are being placed under and get that confirmed in writing, since the answer determines whether any ceiling applies to you at all.
One protection applies regardless of which plan is chosen.
On early termination, a client is entitled to a proportionate refund for the unexpired period, and a Research Analyst may not retain a breakage fee.
Also Read: Rishav Kasera has eight different services, all priced identically, with no explanation for why.
Does Research Samrat Insights’ Complaint Table Add Up?
Checking the firm’s own tables against each other turns up a specific, traceable discrepancy for the most recent reporting month.
Current Complaint Status, August 2026
| Source | Pending at End of July | Received in August | Resolved in August | Total Pending | Pending Over 3 Months | Avg. Resolution Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Directly from Investors | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 days |
| SEBI (SCORES) | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 6 days |
| Other Sources | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 days |
| Grand Total | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 6 days |
Monthly Disposal Trend, Recent Months
| Month | Carried Forward | Received | Resolved | Pending |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| June 2026 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 |
| July 2026 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 1 |
| August 2026 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
Two Different Paths to the Same Ending Number
Both tables agree that August 2026 closed with 2 complaints pending. They do not agree on how that figure was reached.
The current status table states 2 complaints were pending at the end of July, with 1 received and 1 resolved during August.
The monthly trend table’s own July row closes with 1 pending, not 2, and its August row shows 2 received, not 1.
Carried forward and received differ between the two tables, even though the ending pending figure happens to match.
A reader checking only the current status table would conclude July ended with a heavier backlog and August was relatively quiet.
A reader checking the monthly trend would conclude the opposite: a lighter July backlog followed by a busier August.
Both cannot be correct at the same time, and the site does not explain which one is.
Complaint Volume has Grown Sharply, and the Two Tables that Measure It Do Agree
| Financial Year | Received | Resolved | Pending |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | 6 | 6 | 0 |
| 2026-27 | 15 | 13 | 2 |
Unlike the August discrepancy above, this annual table reconciles correctly against the monthly figures.
The 6 complaints in FY2025-26 match the sum of the monthly entries from August 2025 through March 2026, and the 15 in FY2026-27 match the sum from April 2026 onward.
Where the tables can be checked against each other this way, they agree, and that is worth stating plainly.
What the reconciled numbers show is a registration barely a year old already recording 15 complaints in a single partial financial year, well above the 6 recorded in its first, shorter year.
Monthly received counts of 5, 4 and 3 in April, June and August respectively show this is a sustained pattern across several months rather than a single spike.
Also Read: Ritu Chouhan has a complaint summary frozen more than a year behind the firm’s own trend data.
What Other Details on the Website Are Worth Knowing?
A few further points are worth a closer look before you subscribe.
1. The Research Samrat App Cannot Be Found on the Play Store
The site states that research alerts are delivered through the Research Samrat app, without providing a direct download link.
A search of the Google Play Store does not turn up an app under this name.
If app delivery is genuinely part of your subscription, ask the firm directly for a verifiable download link before relying on it as a delivery channel.
2. The Privacy Policy Contradicts Itself on Data Sharing
The policy states that client information will be sold, rented, exchanged, transferred, or given to any company or individual for any reason without your consent, immediately followed by a statement that information is used only to provide subscribed services.
Read literally, the first sentence says the opposite of what a standard data protection clause is meant to say, and the two statements sitting next to each other do not resolve cleanly into one clear policy.
This reads as a probable drafting error rather than a stated intention to sell client data, but it is worth asking the firm to correct and clarify directly, since the clause as written does not currently protect what it appears intended to protect.
3. Registering a Phone Number Opts You into Promotional Contact
By registering a mobile number, users are treated as having consented to promotional calls, SMS, newsletters, surveys, contests and polls, without a separate opt-in for marketing communications distinct from the research service itself.
4. Promotional Language Worth Reading with Caution
The site describes itself as a “100% TRUSTED PLATFORM” trusted by “thousands of investors,” and carries the headline “Smarter Investments. Better Outcomes.”
Claims of this kind, made without supporting data, are the type of language SEBI’s advertisement standards for Research Analysts caution against, particularly the outcome-oriented headline.
How to File a Complaint Against Research Samrat Insights?
Given the direct conflict between the firm’s own terms and its own pricing, a complaint here has firmer, more documentable ground than a dispute over research quality alone.
Start by citing the firm’s own Terms of Service, which state the ₹1,51,000 ceiling, directly against what you were actually charged for the Basic Plan.
Ask separately for a working link to the Research Samrat app if it was described as part of your subscription, and ask the firm to reconcile its current complaint summary against its monthly trend table for August 2026.
Send your grievance to the RA firm’s email ID, describing what you were told, what you paid, and what you want resolved. Keep the sent record regardless of what comes back.
If the response is not satisfactory, escalation runs through a specific set of channels, and each one exists for a different stage of the dispute rather than as alternatives to pick from.
- SEBI SCORES: File your complaint on the SEBI SCORES complaint portal. This puts your grievance in front of the regulator directly and opens a formal window for a response.
- SMART ODR: Move to structured conciliation through the SMART ODR portal if SCORES does not resolve it. Here, a neutral conciliator works with both sides to find common ground.
- Arbitration: Where conciliation still does not settle it, arbitration in stock exchange proceedings end in a binding, enforceable award. Whatever the arbitrator decides at this stage is final and enforceable.
These stages build on each other, so it helps to know what to expect at each before you start.
If you want to know the full process in detail, check our guide complaint against SEBI registered research analyst.
Paying more than the firm’s own terms say you should?
We cite the firm’s own stated fee cap against what you were actually charged, calculate the exact excess, and put the figure on record in a form the analyst has to respond to. Register with us for a free read on your situation.
Disclaimer
This page is based on Research Samrat Insights’ own published material and the SEBI intermediary register, current as of September 2026, and alleges no wrongdoing since no SEBI order stands against the firm.
Registration details, pricing, and website content can change, so verify everything at source before acting. Treat this page as research, not legal or investment advice.
Conclusion
Research Samrat Insights Pvt Ltd holds a genuine SEBI Research Analyst registration, INH000022428, active since August 2025.
The clearest issue on this page needs no outside comparison to establish.
The firm’s own Terms of Service state the ₹1,51,000 SEBI fee ceiling correctly, and its own pricing page charges ₹1,77,000 for the Basic Plan regardless.
Its complaint tables separately disagree on the specific path August 2026’s figures took, even though they land on the same ending total, and complaint volume has grown sharply in a registration not yet a year and a half old.
Before subscribing to the Basic Plan, cite the firm’s own stated cap directly and ask why the published price exceeds it.
Report. Recover. Stay Fraud Free.
Frequently Asked Questions
Yes. It is registered to Research Samrat Insights Pvt Ltd from 5 August 2025 and is perpetual. Confirm it directly on the SEBI register rather than relying on the website alone.
Yes, on the figures published. At ₹1,77,000 a year, it exceeds the ₹1,51,000 ceiling the firm's own Terms of Service state applies to individual and HUF clients, by ₹26,000.
No. The ₹1,51,000 ceiling applies to individual and HUF clients who are not accredited investors. A plan priced this high is not itself a violation if it is genuinely sold only to non individual or accredited clients. Confirm your client category directly if this plan, or anything similar, is offered to you.
The current status table and the monthly trend table use different figures for complaints carried forward and received during the month, though both arrive at the same ending total of 2 pending. The site does not explain the difference.
Not currently through the Google Play Store, where no app under this name could be found. Ask the firm directly for a verifiable link if app based delivery is part of your subscription.
Add us as a preferred source on Google »
