Quick Summary
Tradevia Research holds SEBI registration INH000018009 under Manish Sahu since July 2024. Three reviewers on a public platform describe a demo trade that lost Rs. 10,000 before any subscription, eight weeks of continuous losses followed by upselling to expensive packages, and a demand for 40% of trading profits. The complaint count grew from 2 in FY 2024-25 to 6 in FY 2025-26. All are marked resolved. Monthly data shows the complaint spike happened mid-year. No complaints were pending as of June 2026.
Before you subscribe to Tradevia Research, two numbers matter more than any marketing claim. Six complaints in FY 2025-26. Three public reviews describing the same three patterns independently.
If you found this page after searching for Tradevia Research reviews, you are doing the right homework.
This page covers every publicly available review account in detail, the full monthly complaint data, and what each finding means before you hand over any money.
The Three Reviews That Tell the Real Story
These accounts are from named reviewers on a publicly accessible platform. We are reporting what they wrote. We have not independently verified the specific trades described. No SEBI order confirming these specific allegations has been issued as of the date of this review.
The three reviews span from July 2025 to March 2026. They come from different users at different points in time. The fact that they describe the same three patterns independently is the most important thing about them.
1. Demo Trade Used as a Trap
This reviewer describes being contacted by Tradevia Research for a demo trade before any subscription was required. He followed the call. He lost Rs. 10,000 on the demo itself, before paying a single rupee.
When he raised this with the firm, the response placed all blame on market conditions. No accountability was taken.
He warned other investors specifically about the profit screenshots Tradevia Research shares. According to him, those screenshots are not independently verified and are used to build false confidence before drawing an investor into a demo.
2. Expensive Upsell Packages After Continuous Losses
This reviewer joined after a demo session. He lost Rs. 7,000 on day one of the demo and continued believing the market was having a bad day.
Over the next 8 weeks, the pattern was consistent. A Rs. 2,000 gain one day, a Rs. 3,000 loss the next. Net loss across 8 weeks: approximately Rs. 20,000.
Throughout this period, the firm repeatedly approached him to buy more expensive service packages. The pitch included multiple trade entries, access to both Nifty and Bank Nifty, and more calls per day.
The promise was always that the better plan would recover what the cheaper one lost.
He never upgraded and left. He posted this review to warn others.
3. Profit Sharing Demand
This is the most direct account of the three. The reviewer states that Tradevia Research collected 40% of his profits when trades went well. When the same firm’s recommendations led to losses, the firm became unreachable.
No explanation was given for the losing trades. No accountability was offered. The response, when one eventually came, was that market conditions were unfavourable.
The 40% profit sharing demand is not a commercial arrangement. It is a named violation under SEBI Research Analyst Regulations 2014, which explicitly prohibit any profit sharing or loss sharing arrangement between a registered research analyst and a client.
Related Article: Similar RAs have faced severe user backlash over similar practices. Read our full Streetgains reviews analysis for a complete SEBI comparison.
What the Monthly Complaint Data of Tradevia Research Shows
The annual numbers tell you the total. The monthly breakdown tells you when complaints arrived and whether the disclosure is being kept current.
Monthly Complaint Data: May 2025 to June 2026
| Month | Received | Resolved | Pending |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2025 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jun 2025 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jul 2025 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Aug 2025 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Sep 2025 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 2025 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Nov 2025 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Dec 2025 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jan 2026 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Feb 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mar 2026 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Apr 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| May 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jun 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Three things stand out in this data.
The complaint spike aligns with the review timeline. The first review was posted July 18, 2025. The first complaint in the monthly data arrived in July 2025. The November 4, 2025 review is followed by a complaint in November 2025. The March 2026 review aligns with the March 2026 complaint. The reviews and the complaints describe the same period.
All complaints were resolved within the same month they were received. Fast resolution can mean genuine redressal. It can also mean the firm submitted a response through the formal channel without the investor’s grievance being fully addressed.
No complaints since March 2026. Whether this reflects improved practices, a smaller subscriber base, or investors who did not know how to file formally is not possible to determine from the data.
Annual Complaint Trend
| Year | Complaints Received | Resolved | Pending |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-24 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024-25 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| 2025-26 | 6 | 6 | 0 |
The firm launched in 2024. The first complaints arrived in its first operating year.
By FY 2025-26, the count had tripled. For a research analyst with a relatively small subscriber base, six complaints in one financial year is a meaningful concentration of grievances.
Also Read: Eqwires Reviews, another Research Analyst whose own SEBI order confirmed violations of the same regulations, alongside fabricated client testimonials.
What These Reviews Mean If You Are Evaluating Tradevia Research
Three reviewers describing the same three patterns- demo loss used as subscription pressure, upselling during a losing streak, profit sharing demand- is not a coincidence. It is a pattern.
The full registration details, service breakdown, and five specific red flags mapped to SEBI regulations are covered on the Tradevia Research review page. Reading that page alongside this one gives you the complete picture before any money changes hands.
Before subscribing, ask the firm three direct questions in writing and keep their responses.
- What is the exact fee for each plan including GST?
- How is brokerage calculated and what is the total annual cap?
- Do you or your representatives take any share of profits from client trades?
The answer to the third question tells you everything. If the answer is yes, that arrangement is a direct SEBI violation, and you should not proceed. Also, if the firm avoids answering or deflects, that is itself information.
If you have already subscribed and your experience matches what the reviewers describe, the formal complaint path is available; the complete filing guide covering SCORES through arbitration is on the complaint against Tradevia Research page.
Still unsure whether what happened to you crosses a regulatory line?
We review your documents, identify every applicable SEBI violation, and build the strongest possible complaint for your situation. Register with us for a free consultation.
Conclusion
Three reviews. Six complaints. One consistent pattern across all three accounts.
Tradevia Research is SEBI registered. That is confirmed. What the reviews and complaint data together reveal is that the registration period has not been free of investor grievances, and that three investors who went public described the same three practices independently.
That consistency is what makes this data worth paying attention to before you pay.
Report. Recover. Stay Fraud Free.
The three reviews cited in this page are from named users on a publicly accessible platform. The accounts are independently posted at different dates between July 2025 and March 2026. We have not independently verified the specific transactions but the reviews are real public accounts that can be verified on the platform they were posted on. The firm received 2 complaints in FY 2024-25 and 6 in FY 2025-26. The monthly breakdown shows complaints arrived in July, August, October, November 2025, January and March 2026. These months align closely with the dates of the three public user reviews, suggesting the reviews and complaints are describing the same period of investor dissatisfaction. No. A complaint marked resolved means the firm submitted a formal response through the grievance mechanism. It does not confirm the investor accepted that response as satisfactory. Investors who were not satisfied with the resolution could have escalated to SMART ODR or arbitration rather than leaving the complaint as closed. SEBI caps the total fees a single client can pay to one registered Research Analyst at Rs. 1,51,000 per financial year across all plans combined. If your combined payments to Tradevia Research in any financial year exceeded this amount, the excess may be recoverable through a formal SEBI SCORES complaint. Go to SEBI's website. Click on Registered Intermediaries. Select Research Analyst. Enter INH000018009 in the search field. Confirm the registration shows Active status in the name of Manish Sahu. This takes under two minutes and is the single most important check before paying any advisory firm.Frequently Asked Questions
Add us as a preferred source on Google »
