Quick Summary
Prime Market Research carries a 2.9 star average on Google and 2.8 stars on JustDial. Its mandatory complaint disclosure records 35 complaints received since 2023, 34 resolved, with 1 currently pending as of July 2026. Named Google reviewers describe losses ranging from ₹30,000 to nearly ₹2 lakh, unresponsive support staff, and one account naming the proprietor directly. The complaint disclosure has not been updated since July 2026, leaving August 2026 unaccounted for. Registration and pricing are covered separately on our Prime Market Research page.
A 2.9-star average on Google doesn’t usually sit next to a complaint count running into the dozens, but that is exactly the pair of numbers behind this firm.
Its own mandatory disclosure records 35 complaints since 2023, one still unresolved.
Named Google reviewers describe losses running into six figures, staff who stopped responding once payment cleared, and one account that calls out the proprietor by name.
Read together, Prime Market Research Reviews across every platform tell a story that a single star rating cannot capture on its own.
This page works through the complaint disclosure in full, along with every named review on Google and JustDial, so you can see exactly what the numbers and the accounts say before you subscribe, or before you escalate a complaint of your own.
Prime Market Research Reviews And Ratings
Reviews of Prime Market Research are split across two independent platforms and the firm’s own regulatory complaint disclosure, and the three sources describe a broadly consistent picture rather than pulling in different directions.
The complaint volume is genuinely significant for a firm of this size, and the named reviews on Google in particular describe specific sums lost and specific staff involved, which gives this page more to work with than a star rating alone would.
Registration, pricing, and the full fee cap math sit on a separate page, our Prime Market Research hub, since this one is built entirely around what the complaint record and the reviews actually show.
What Does Prime Market Research’s Complaint Disclosure Show?
Before getting into the numbers, it helps to know what each of the three tables actually measures, since a monthly snapshot, a rolling monthly trend, and a yearly total answer different questions and need to be read together rather than in isolation.
Current Complaint Status, July 2026
| Source | Pending at End of Last Month | Received | Resolved | Total Pending | Pending Over 3 Months | Avg. Resolution Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Directly from Investors | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | N/A |
| SEBI (SCORES) | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 21 days |
| Other Sources | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | N/A |
| Grand Total | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 21 days |
Monthly Disposal Trend
| Month | Carried Forward | Received | Resolved | Pending |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2025 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sep 2025 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| Oct 2025 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 |
| Nov 2025 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 |
| Dec 2025 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Jan 2026 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0 |
| Feb 2026 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 |
| Mar 2026 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 |
| Apr 2026* | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| May 2026 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| Jun 2026 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Jul 2026 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| Grand Total | 0 | 22 | 21 | 1 |
*The source disclosure labels this row “Apr 2025.” Based on its position directly between March 2026 and May 2026 in the sequence, this is treated here as April 2026, a labelling slip on the firm’s own table rather than a separate finding.
Annual Disposal Trend
| Financial Year | Received | Resolved | Pending |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-24 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024-25 | 5 | 5 | 0 |
| 2025-26 | 25 | 25 | 0 |
| 2026-27 | 5 | 4 | 1 |
| Grand Total | 35 | 34 | 1 |
What the Numbers Show, Taken One Point at a Time
Each figure here carries its own context, and it’s worth walking through them individually rather than taking the totals at face value.
1. The Disclosure Has Not Been Updated for the Current Month
The most recent complaint data published is for July 2026.
As of September 2026, that leaves August 2026 unaccounted for, roughly one reporting cycle behind SEBI’s requirement that data be updated by the 7th of the following month.
This is a narrower gap than some firms reviewed on this site, but it is still a gap.
2. The Complaint Volume Is Genuinely Significant
35 complaints since 2023, with 25 of them in FY2025-26 alone, is a substantial number for a firm of this size.
This is worth weighing carefully before subscribing, separate from how well the tables reconcile with each other.
3. The Tables That Can Be Checked Against Each Other Do Reconcile
The monthly trend’s figures for April through July 2026 total 5 received and 4 resolved, matching the annual table’s FY2026-27 row exactly.
The monthly trend only extends back to August 2025, so the earlier months of FY2025-26 cannot be checked against the annual total the same way, but nothing in the overlapping period contradicts it.
Where the two tables can be compared directly, they agree, which is worth crediting rather than treated with the same suspicion warranted elsewhere.
4. The July 2026 Snapshot Points to the Regulator, Not the Firm
The current month table shows the single complaint received in July arrived through SEBI SCORES, with nothing logged as received directly from investors.
Combined with the two complaints carried forward and resolved in the same month, this suggests at least some clients are approaching the regulator rather than the firm’s own grievance channel first, though the data alone cannot confirm why.
Also Read: Rakesh Bansal Ventures Reviews looks at user ratings & an unverified allegation about aggressive personal data collection during signup.
What Do Google Reviews of Prime Market Research Say?
Prime Market Research holds a 2.9-star average on Google, and several detailed reviews describe a consistent pattern worth reading in full rather than summarised into a single line.
1. A Reviewer Describes a ₹1.8 Lakh Loss and Names Both a Staff Member and the Proprietor
This reviewer states they joined on 12 December 2025 and had lost ₹1.8 lakh by the time of writing.
They name a staff member assigned to them, describing him as often unresponsive, and state that the phone number provided for complaints did not work.
They describe most Telegram calls hitting stop loss, and state directly that the proprietor, whom they name, should conduct more research and provide better guidance to clients.
The reviewer also states they paid ₹1.75 lakh for a one-year subscription before these losses occurred.
2. A Reviewer Describes a Named Staff Member and a ₹30,000 to ₹40,000 Loss
This reviewer names a staff member who suggested three to four calls, and states those calls led to a loss in the range of ₹30,000 to ₹40,000.
They describe repeated attempts to reach this staff member by call and message going unanswered.
3. A Reviewer Describes an Initial Small Profit Followed by Pressure to Subscribe & a Loss Recovery Pitch
This reviewer describes an initial profit of around ₹1,000 used to encourage a paid subscription, followed by trial calls they say were incorrect and told to close at a loss.
They describe subsequently being contacted again with an offer to recover that loss through a further subscription.
4. A Reviewer Describes a ₹70,000 Fee and a Loss of Roughly ₹1.1 Lakh Within Two Weeks
This reviewer states they paid approximately ₹70,000 in fees and lost close to ₹1.1 lakh within a two-week period, describing their overall loss across the experience as approaching ₹2 lakh.
They compare the approach to speculative trading rather than structured research, and suggest that confidence in a strategy would normally lead a firm to trade it directly rather than sell it to clients.
What Do JustDial Reviews of Prime Market Research Say?
The firm’s JustDial listing carries a 2.8-star average.
A Reviewer Describes a Poor Experience and Offers Unsolicited Help With Refunds
One reviewer describes their experience as poor and separately offers to help other commenters pursue a refund from the company, inviting them to make contact directly through the review itself.
Be cautious of this kind of offer wherever it appears.
An unverified individual offering refund assistance inside a public review, rather than through any official or regulated channel, is a pattern worth treating carefully in its own right, regardless of how genuine the original complaint may be.
Pursue a refund through the firm directly or through the regulatory channels covered below, not through contact details left in a review.
We are reporting what this user said on a public platform. We are not independently verifying this account, and no SEBI order confirming this conduct has been issued as of this writing.
How to File a Complaint Against Prime Market Research?
If your own experience matches any of the patterns described above, whether an unresponsive staff member, a loss followed by a recovery pitch, or a fee that does not match what you understood you were paying, a documented approach gives you firmer ground than a dispute over research quality alone.
Start by writing to the RA’s email ID, describing what you were told, what you paid, who you dealt with, and what you want resolved.
If a specific staff member was assigned to you, name them in your email. Keep the sent record regardless of what comes back.
If a direct grievance goes unresolved, several escalation channels exist beyond the firm itself.
Each one is built for a different stage of the same dispute, not as an alternative to pick from instead of the others.
1. SEBI SCORES: File your complaint on the SEBI SCORES complaint portal.
2. SMART ODR: Move to structured conciliation through the SMART ODR portal if SCORES does not resolve it.
3. Arbitration: Where conciliation still does not settle it, arbitration in stock exchange proceedings ends in a binding, enforceable award.
These three channels form a sequence, not a menu of alternatives, so it’s worth knowing where each one fits before you begin.
If you want to know the full process in detail, check our guide complaint against SEBI registered research analyst.
Told your losses would be recovered if you subscribed again?
We build your case around your own payment records and chat history, name the staff member and the specific promise involved, and put your complaint on record in a form the firm has to respond to. Register with us for a free read on your situation.
Disclaimer
This page is based on Prime Market Research’s own published complaint disclosure and named public reviews, reported rather than independently verified, current as of September 2026.
No SEBI order stands against the firm as of this writing. Verify current figures at source before acting, and treat this page as research, not legal or investment advice.
Conclusion
Prime Market Research’s complaint disclosure shows 35 complaints since 2023, 34 resolved and 1 pending, with the tables that can be cross-checked reconciling cleanly, though the data itself has not been updated since July 2026.
Independent reviews on Google and JustDial describe a consistent pattern beyond the raw numbers: named staff members, losses ranging from ₹30,000 to close to ₹2 lakh, and more than one account describing a subscription pitched as a way to recover an earlier loss.
If your own experience matches any of this, document everything now: the staff member’s name, the amount paid, and the specific promise made, before approaching the firm directly and, if needed, the regulator.
Report. Recover. Stay Fraud Free.
Frequently Asked Questions
Its own disclosure shows 35 complaints received since 2023, with 34 resolved and 1 pending as of July 2026, the most recent month published.
Where the tables can be checked against each other, they reconcile correctly. The main limitation is that the data stops at July 2026, leaving the most recent month unpublished as of this writing.
Named, detailed reviews carry more weight than a generic complaint, particularly when several independent reviewers describe a similar pattern, but they remain unverified third party accounts rather than a regulatory finding.
No. Pursue a refund through the firm directly or through SEBI's official channels. An unverified individual offering help inside a public review is not a safe or accountable route to recovering money.
Document that promise in writing if you have it, along with who made it and when, since a loss recovery pitch is one of the clearest and most actionable details in a complaint of this kind.
Add us as a preferred source on Google »
