Rajendra Vitthal Suryawanshi holds SEBI Research Analyst registration INH000007094, active since 6 May 2019, based in Nashik, Maharashtra. The registration is genuine. What does not hold up is the complaint disclosure on his own site, where two tables covering the identical month, August 2026, show two different numbers: 11 complaints on one, zero on the […]
Rakesh Bansal Ventures’ own mandatory disclosure records 17 complaints received since 2021, every one marked resolved. Five named reviewers on the firm’s own app rating page describe a more mixed experience than that clean resolution figure suggests on its own. This page works through the complaint disclosure in full, along with every named app review
Rakesh Bansal Ventures operates under SEBI Research Analyst registration INH100008984, held by Dr. Rakesh Bansal, active in Indian markets since 1998 and registered with SEBI since December 2021. Individually, none of the firm’s six research plans cost enough in a year to breach the SEBI fee ceiling. The product range is built around six distinct
Stock Research Analytics 360 holds SEBI Research Analyst registration INH000018878, held by Rajeshwar Mandal. The registration is genuine and confirmed independently across the firm’s own site and its social media bios. What is not fine is the pricing page. Of seven billing cycles published across nine services, six breach the SEBI annual fee ceiling, one
The issue extended its bidding window and priced at the floor of its band. Both facts are public. Neither was widely noticed, and together they point to a gap in what SME applicants are able to see. Harikanta Overseas Limited, a Surat-based manufacturer of synthetic textile fabrics, raised approximately Rs 25.6 crore on the SME
The videos showed students celebrating massive profits after joining the course. SEBI checked the same students’ actual trades and found most of them were sitting in losses. That gap between the marketing and the reality cost one academy a Rs 600 crore penalty. Before you pay for the next “mentorship,” run this checklist on the
Sachin purchased a trading advisory plan for ₹63,900. He used it actively for about ten to twelve days, during which he incurred a loss of close to ₹20,000. Facing a temporary shortage of trading capital, he informed the firm honestly that he would need to pause his participation for a while. Rather than treating this
Nitilesh Pawaskar has held SEBI Research Analyst registration INH000004547 since 19 December 2016, and across the seven financial years his own disclosure covers, exactly one complaint appears on the record. That is a genuinely unusual number in this sector, and it deserves saying before anything else. Which makes what follows more interesting rather than less.
One Market Signal holds SEBI Research Analyst registration INH000019044, active since 12 December 2024, and operates under Rohit Yadav from Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh. The registration checks out cleanly against the firm’s own repeated statements across its site. What does not check out as cleanly is a specific line in its refund policy, one that directly
Omkar Thakur has held SEBI Research Analyst registration INH000017532 since 12 July 2024, and operates under the trading brand StockVista. The registration itself checks out cleanly against SEBI’s own published list. What does not check out as cleanly is what happens once you look past the registration number to the pricing page. Four of the
Omkara Capital’s own website states it has had zero complaints on SCORES. Its own mandatory complaint disclosure, published on the same site, records 12 complaints across two financial years. That is not a rounding difference or a reporting period mismatch of the kind that shows up on other firms’ disclosures. It is a plain claim
Omkara Capital Private Limited has held SEBI Research Analyst registration INH000008206 since 23 February 2021, and separately holds Investment Adviser registration INA000016825 since April 2022. That second registration is worth flagging upfront because of how it is structured; since it is not a separate company trading under a similar name, the confusion that shows up
