Quick Summary
Global Vision Research’s Google reviews run one star, not four or five. One reviewer says she paid and got no service back. Another, an experienced Local Guide, says the firm does not deserve even one star. Beyond these two named reviews, other users describe paying high fees for a service that did not feel worth the money, while several of the positive reviews talk about the company as a workplace rather than about actual client results. The firm’s own complaint tables add to the picture, with numbers that do not add up and years of data missing entirely. This page covers every review and every complaint table in full.
Global Vision Research reviews on Google tell a different story than the firm’s own marketing does.
Two named reviewers gave the firm one star each, and neither review is vague about why.
Two more patterns show up across the wider set of reviews too, even without a specific name attached to each one.
This page goes through every review in detail, then checks the firm’s own complaint tables against what SEBI expects to see.
Global Vision Research Indore Reviews
Since Global Vision Research operates out of Indore, its Google Business listing is the most useful independent place to check what actual clients experienced, separate from anything the firm says about itself.
A search of that listing turns up two named, detailed one star reviews, along with two wider patterns worth understanding even though no single quote captures either one.
Each account below covers a different part of the same overall picture, so read them to see how they connect.
1. Payment Made, Service Never Delivered
A reviewer named Aayushi Panday, who has left three reviews on Google, rated the firm one star roughly a year ago.
Her review states plainly that the company is very useless for investors, since it takes payment but does not provide the service in return.
We are reporting what this user said on a public platform. We are not independently verifying this account. No SEBI order confirming this specific conduct exists as of the date of this review.
This complaint lines up with a clause on the firm’s own Terms page, which states subscription fees once paid are not refundable.
A client who paid and received nothing would still be blocked from a refund under that exact wording, since the clause carves out no exception for a service that was never delivered.
SEBI treats collecting a fee and then not delivering the promised research as a failure of the analyst’s core duty to the client. This duty applies to every registered analyst, without exception.
2. One Star From a Reviewer Who Rarely Rates This Low
A second reviewer, Tulika Kangsa Banik, holds Local Guide status on Google with 17 reviews and one photo to her name.
Her review is short and direct. It states that the company does not deserve even a single star.
We are reporting what this user said on a public platform. We are not independently verifying this account. No SEBI order confirming this specific conduct exists as of the date of this review.
A reviewer with 17 reviews behind her has rated plenty of places before this one. That kind of history usually spreads across a full range of ratings, not just the bottom.
Landing on one star from a profile like this stands apart from a first time reviewer with nothing to compare it against.
Beyond these two named reviews, a couple of wider patterns are worth knowing about, even without a specific name or quote attached to either one.
Some users have described paying a high fee and feeling the service did not match what was promised for that price, a pattern that lines up closely with the pricing findings on the main Global Vision Research review page, where most plans already sit above SEBI’s yearly fee cap.
Separately, several of the firm’s positive reviews focus on what it is like to work at the company rather than on how recommendations actually performed for a paying client, which is worth keeping in mind before treating the overall star rating as a straightforward measure of client satisfaction.
Taken together, these accounts describe two very different pictures depending on which reviews you read. The two named complaints above are specific and client focused.
A meaningful share of the positive reviews are not really about the service at all.
For the full registration details and the complete pricing breakdown against SEBI’s fee cap, the Global Vision Research page on this site covers both in detail.
What Does Global Vision Research’s Complaint Data Show?
SEBI requires every registered Research Analyst to publish investor complaint data in a set format, updated regularly.
Global Vision Research’s own disclosure covers three different snapshots, and none of them tell a fully clean story once you read the numbers closely.
Monthly data for the month ending October 2025
| Received From | Pending Last Month | Received | Resolved | Total Pending | Pending > 3 Months | Avg. Resolution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Directly from Investors | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| SEBI (SCORES) | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 20-25 Days |
| Other Sources | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grand Total | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | N/A |
Annual complaint trend
| Year | Carried Forward | Received | Resolved | Pending |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023-24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grand Total | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
A separate monthly entry for April 2026
| Received From | Received | Resolved | Total Pending |
|---|---|---|---|
| Directly from Investors | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| SEBI (SCORES) | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Other Sources | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grand Total | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Why Doesn’t Global Vision Research’s Complaint Data Add Up?
Look closely at the April 2026 row for SEBI SCORES. It shows zero complaints received, yet the same row marks one complaint as resolved.
A complaint cannot be resolved in a period where none were received, and none were carried forward from before. The numbers as published contradict themselves.
The gap in dates is the second problem. The most recent full disclosure on the site is dated October 2025, and this review is being written well after that.
Where is the data for the months in between? SEBI expects this table to be refreshed regularly, not left showing a period that is now well out of date.
The annual table only tells part of the story too. It shows just two years, 2022-23 and 2023-24, both at zero.
A firm operating since 2024 with a registration this recent should not have a sparse two-year table with no more recent year added.
None of these three issues alone proves the firm is hiding something.
Together, they describe a disclosure that is incomplete, inconsistent, and not being kept current, exactly the kind of pattern SEBI’s monthly update requirement exists to prevent.
Where Can You Report a Problem With Global Vision Research?
If either review above matches your own experience, or the complaint data raised questions for you too, a few genuine channels exist to act on it.
- SEBI SCORES complaint to file a formal complaint against the firm directly
- SMART ODR portal if SCORES does not resolve your case
- Share market arbitration as the final, binding step if the matter is still unresolved
The complete process, with timelines, is covered on the how to complaint against Global Vision Research page on this site.
Recognise the payment-without-service pattern from your own experience with Global Vision Research?
We will review your payment records and communication history, match your case against the specific pattern documented here, and help you file a SCORES complaint that actually gets a response.
Disclaimer: The reviews on this page are individual accounts posted by users on public platforms and have not been independently verified. They reflect the reviewers’ own experiences, not a confirmed SEBI finding.
Conclusion
Global Vision Research’s public record on Google reads one star, twice over, with no better ratings from a genuine client to balance either one.
Its own complaint tables add to the concern: numbers that contradict each other, with years of data missing.
Neither problem sits on its own. A client who already paid deserves a straight answer, not numbers that do not add up or reviews that are hard to tell apart from workplace feedback.
If your own experience matches what these reviewers describe, the consultation offered above is where to start.
Report. Recover. Stay FraudFree.
Frequently Asked Questions
They are the two most detailed, named reviews found while researching this page. Google listings change over time, so it is worth checking the live page yourself before you subscribe.
Yes. A SCORES complaint does not depend on a Google review existing at all. What matters is your payment record and your communication with the firm.
Not always. Several positive reviews focus on the company as a workplace rather than on client results, so a high star count alone does not confirm good service for paying clients.
This is an inconsistency in the firm's own published table. A complaint cannot be resolved in a period where none were received or carried forward, which suggests the disclosure was not checked carefully before publishing.
The Global Vision Research page on this site covers the full SEBI registration verification and the complete pricing breakdown against SEBI's fee cap.
Add us as a preferred source on Google »
