Quick Summary
Three separate Google Play reviewers describe the same pattern after paying Trading With Karol. Payment goes through. Verification fails. Support goes silent. No refund follows. A Reddit thread on r/IndianStreetBets calls the operation a scammer. The complaint table that SEBI requires to be publicly visible exists only on thetradingfox.com, not on the Graphy platform or the app where the actual products are sold. This page covers every public account in the reviewer’s own words and explains what the missing complaint table means for anyone still deciding whether to pay.
Trading With Karol reviews across the Play Store describe a familiar pattern.
Three separate users report paying first and then hitting verification walls or silence.
A Reddit thread calls the operation a scammer outright.
None of this touches the registration number itself, which is real. What it touches is everything that happens after you click pay.
What the Trading With Karol Reviews on Play Store Actually Say?
Five separate public sources carry user feedback on Trading with Karol. Three of them describe the same sequence. A person pays, tries to get onboarded, and then waits.
This section covers each account in the reviewer’s own words with the SEBI angle explained alongside it.
We are reporting what these users said on public platforms. We are not independently verifying these accounts. No SEBI order confirming this specific conduct exists as of July 2026.
Review 1: Premium Membership Paid For, Never Delivered
One reviewer describes attending a live session and paying for premium membership right after.
According to this reviewer, the promised Telegram group access never arrived because Aadhaar verification kept failing on the platform’s end.
Repeated follow-ups produced only delays. No group access. No refund offered.
A SEBI-registered entity that collects payment but fails to deliver the paid service has a specific obligation. Fair dealing and grievance redressal requirements apply to every SEBI-registered intermediary, not just to the research report itself.
If verification is broken on the platform’s side, the platform carries the responsibility to fix it. Not the paying client.
Review 2: Payment Cleared, Access Never Opened
A second reviewer reports that payment went through in full but no service ever opened inside the app.
This reviewer also states they could not get the amount refunded after multiple attempts.
This reads less like a technical glitch and more like a plain non-delivery complaint. A client who pays for an offering but receives neither the product nor a refund has clear grounds to act through SCORES.
Review 3: Verification Failures for Five Days Straight
A third reviewer describes a longer ordeal. Both Aadhaar and PAN verification kept failing for five consecutive days after payment cleared.
Calls went unanswered. No group access followed.
Five days of silence after payment is not a minor onboarding hiccup. It points to a support structure that cannot keep pace with sign-ups. That matters for anyone still weighing whether to trust this platform with money today.
The Reddit Thread Calling Trading with Karol a Scammer
A public thread exists on the subreddit r/IndianStreetBets. Its title directly calls the Trading With Karol operation a scammer.
The thread’s existence, independent of any single comment inside it, functions as a market reputation signal worth factoring into your own due diligence.
Reddit threads are user-generated and unverified. Treat this as a signal to dig deeper, not as standalone proof. Confirm specific allegations through your own documentation before repeating them anywhere.
We are reporting what this thread states on a public platform. We are not independently verifying this account. No SEBI order confirming this specific conduct exists as of July 2026.
Why the Missing Complaint Table Is Worse Than Any Single Review?
A bad review is one person’s account of one experience. A missing complaint table means there is no aggregate record for anyone to check.
Every SEBI-registered Research Analyst must maintain and publish complaint data somewhere a client can actually find it before paying. That data does exist for this registration. It lives on thetradingfox.com.
The problem shows up the moment you look at where courses and premium plans are actually sold.
The Graphy course platform, the app listings, the Telegram channel, and the YouTube handles all carry zero visible complaint or grievance data.
A person deciding whether to pay through any of these four touchpoints has no official complaint history to check.
The complaint table that does exist on thetradingfox.com carries its own problems. The annual table shows 47 complaints received for 2025-26.
Trend of Monthly Disposal of Complaints
| S. No. | Month | Carried Forward | Received | Resolved | Pending |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | September 2025 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 7 |
| 2 | October 2025 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 3 | November 2025 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| 4 | December 2025 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0 |
| 5 | January 2026 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| 6 | February 2026 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 4 |
| 7 | March 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 8 | April 2026 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| 9 | May 2026 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 1 |
| 10 | June 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Trend of Annual Disposal of Complaints
| Sr. No. | Year | Carried Forward | Received | Resolved | Pending |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025-2026 | 0 | 47 | 44 | 3 |
| Grand Total | 3 | ||||
Adding up the monthly table across the same period produces approximately 32. That is a gap of roughly 15 complaints between two tables on the same page.
Individual months carry internal arithmetic errors too.
September 2025 lists figures that should produce 4 pending but the table shows 7. March 2026 should show zero pending but shows 1.
SEBI mandates accurate monthly complaint disclosure. A gap this size is a data integrity concern, not a rounding error.
What the 3 Trading with Karol Reviews Together Describe?
Put the three Play Store complaints and the Reddit thread alongside the missing complaint table and one picture emerges.
Payment tends to arrive faster than service or support does. The verification systems that block access after payment are on the platform’s side.
The support structure that should resolve them is not responding.
A prospective client checking only the Graphy site or the app before paying would find no aggregate complaint history to flag any of this.
The entire burden of due diligence falls on scattered app store reviews and Reddit threads instead.
That is not how a transparent, investor-first platform operates.
What to Do If Your Experience Matches These Reviews?
If you paid for a premium plan, a Telegram group, or an app subscription and got neither the product nor a resolution, that situation has a formal complaint channel.
- Collect your payment receipt, every screenshot of what was promised, and every support message you sent and received. These documents establish the timeline and show that the failure sat with the platform.
- File on SEBI SCORES against Buddhi Prakash Karol citing INH000018090. Select Research Analyst as the intermediary category.
- For the complete complaint process including SCORES filing, SMART ODR escalation, and arbitration, the full guide is on the Trading with Karol blog.
For the guide on tracking your complaint status once filed, the tracking guide covers every status label. Read how to track your SEBI SCORES complaint status.
Our team files your SEBI SCORES complaint, prepares the documentation, and represents you through SMART ODR and arbitration.
Conclusion
Three Play Store reviewers describe the same post-payment experience with Trading With Karol. Payment goes through. Verification fails or access never opens. Support does not respond. No refund follows.
A Reddit thread adds a public reputation signal to the same pattern.
The complaint table that would let a prospective client check this pattern before paying exists only on thetradingfox.com, not on any of the platforms where the actual products are sold.
And the table that does exist carries arithmetic gaps between its own annual and monthly figures.
If your experience matches what these reviews describe, the complaint path is clear and the evidence checklist starts with everything you already have
Frequently Asked Questions
Google Play does not publicly confirm a reviewer's purchase status on the review itself. The details each reviewer describes, including specific verification steps and payment amounts, suggest genuine transactions, though this cannot be independently confirmed without the platform's backend data.
A Reddit thread alone is unlikely to serve as primary evidence in a SCORES filing. What strengthens a complaint is your own payment proof, screenshots, and correspondence. The thread serves as supporting context for a wider pattern, not as standalone proof.
A timestamped screenshot you took before deletion still holds value as personal documentation even after the original disappears from the platform. Save it alongside the date and time you captured it for your own records.
SEBI requires registered Research Analysts to maintain complaint data somewhere accessible to clients. The registered website thetradingfox.com carries this table. The Graphy platform, the app, and the Telegram channel where paid products are actually sold carry none of it. A prospective subscriber checking any of those touchpoints before paying would have no aggregate complaint history to consult.
Screenshot every failed verification attempt with the date and time visible. Screenshot every support message you sent and every response or non-response. This documents that the failure sat with the platform, not with you. It becomes central evidence in a SCORES complaint for non-delivery of a paid service.
Add us as a preferred source on Google »
