Have you ever received a message promising daily profits from the stock market, and for a second, you actually thought, what if this is real?
You are not alone. Thousands of traders across India get similar messages every day. Some ignore them. Some investigate. And some, unfortunately, pay first and learn the hard way.
If you have been looking up Supreme Investrade recently, chances are you saw something that caught your attention: a polished website, confident claims about Nifty and Bank Nifty tips, and a SEBI registration number that seems to make it all look legitimate.
Many investors specifically look for Supreme Investrade registration status or Supreme Investrade complaints before subscribing, and for good reason.
But here is the thing: a SEBI registration is just the starting point. It tells you a firm is allowed to operate. It does not tell you how that firm actually behaves with real clients, real money, and real trades.
So, is Supreme Investrade safe?
In this blog, we break down the firm’s background, red flags, SEBI enforcement history, an arbitration case, and how to protect yourself, all so you can make an informed decision before committing any money.
Supreme Investrade and Research Services
Supreme Investrade and Research Services is a research analyst firm run by Abhishek Kumar Singh, based in Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra.
Many investors often ask, is Supreme Investrade SEBI registered?
The answer is yes; the firm holds SEBI registration number INH000008747, granted on September 9, 2021.
On the surface, it looks like a legitimate operation. It has a registration certificate, a website with disclaimers, and claims to provide research-based trading tips for Nifty, Bank Nifty, and equity options.
The firm primarily delivers its research calls through WhatsApp and a mobile app, targeting intraday traders who want short-term trading guidance.
Its service packages have been priced at significant amounts, in some cases exceeding the firm’s own advertised annual plan rates.
So far, so good, right? But the story does not end with registration. Let us look at what actually happened when clients started trading based on their advice.
Is Supreme Investrade Safe or Not?
To answer this question honestly, we need to look beyond the brochure.
Below are key red flags that any trader should carefully evaluate before subscribing.
1. Profit Screenshots Used to Attract New Clients
SEBI’s December 2024 adjudication order found that Supreme Investrade’s representatives shared screenshots of profits made by existing clients with prospective subscribers.
These were presented in a way that created the impression of consistent, guaranteed daily returns.
This is a direct violation of SEBI’s Research Analyst regulations. Using selective profit data of other clients to attract new subscriptions is classified as an inducement and is explicitly prohibited.
It creates a false picture of what a typical client experience looks like.
If an advisory firm is showing you other people’s profit screenshots to convince you to join, that is your first red flag.
2. Clients Pushed to Add More Capital After Losses
SEBI’s order documented a troubling pattern: when clients lost money on trades, the firm’s representatives did not advise caution or review their approach.
Instead, they encouraged clients to deposit more money, framing it as the path to recovering their losses through future trade calls.
In one documented case, a client was explicitly told to arrange additional capital for trading after already incurring significant losses.
This conduct falls under SEBI’s PFUTP (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices) Regulations and is categorically banned.
Pressuring a loss-making client to add more funds is not research. It is a predatory sales practice that creates compounding financial exposure for the client.
3. Real-Time Trading Instructions Crossing the Research Line
A SEBI-registered research analyst is permitted to issue buy or sell calls with defined targets and stop-loss levels. What they are strictly not allowed to do is give real-time execution instructions.
This constitutes mis-selling and unfair trade practices under SEBI’s framework.
The moment an advisor starts telling you exactly when to buy, how much to buy, and urges speed, they have stepped outside what research advisory is legally meant to be.
4. Tampered SEBI Complaint Resolution
Perhaps the most alarming finding in SEBI’s 2024 order involves the manipulation of SEBI’s own SCORES grievance portal.
An employee of the firm drafted a satisfaction statement on behalf of a complainant, including language like: “I am very happy…”, and then instructed the client to send it to SEBI via email to close their active complaint.
Fabricating a complaint resolution to shut down a genuine grievance filed with the regulator is not a clerical error. It is a deliberate attempt to deceive SEBI’s investor protection system.
The adjudicating officer treated this as a significant aggravating factor.
If a firm instructs you to send SEBI a satisfaction email you did not draft yourself, do not do it. That is your grievance being closed without your actual consent.
Supreme Investrade SEBI Orders
SEBI issued not one, but two separate adjudication orders against Supreme Investrade, one in December 2024 and another in December 2025.
Two orders within twelve months is a pattern, not a coincidence.
SEBI Order 1: December 2024, Penalty of Rs 5,00,000
The December 2024 order examined Supreme Investrade’s client communication records, including WhatsApp chats and audio clips.
The adjudicating officer upheld multiple violations:
- Sharing profit screenshots of existing clients to lure new subscribers is classified as an inducement.
- Pressing loss-making clients to deposit more capital for trading is classified as a predatory, unfair trade practice.
- Issuing real-time buy/sell instructions beyond the scope of research is classified as mis-selling.
- Orchestrating a false SCORES complaint closure by drafting a client satisfaction letter on the client’s behalf, classified as deliberate manipulation of SEBI’s investor grievance mechanism.
- Systematic contradiction between written disclaimers and actual verbal/WhatsApp communication with clients, classified as a deceptive trade practice under PFUTP Regulations.
Penalty imposed: Rs 5,00,000 (Five Lakh Rupees).
In case of non-payment, SEBI reserved the right to initiate recovery proceedings, including property attachment.
SEBI Order 2: December 2025
SEBI issued a second adjudication order against the same proprietor in December 2025.
The fact that a second order was necessary within just twelve months indicates the violations were not isolated incidents corrected after the first penalty.
The second order reinforced SEBI’s concern about the firm’s operating practices and resulted in further regulatory consequences.
Two adjudication orders in a single year from the same regulator, covering the same firm, reflect a sustained pattern of non-compliance that investors cannot afford to overlook.
Key investor takeaway: Before subscribing to any research analyst, check their enforcement history at sebi.gov.in. This information is free, public, and often revealing.
How to Report Against a Research Analyst?
If you have already subscribed and believe you were misled, here is what you should do right away:
Step 1: Preserve All Evidence Immediately
Save every WhatsApp message, audio clip, payment receipt, and screenshot. Do not delete anything.
This is the foundation of any complaint that will be taken seriously.
Step 2: Send a Written Complaint to the Firm
Write formally to Supreme Investrade’s compliance officer, referencing your client ID, the specific conduct that harmed you, and the resolution you are seeking.
Allow 7 to 10 working days for a written reply.
Step 3: File a Complaint in SCORES
If the firm does not respond adequately, escalate to SEBI’s investor grievance portal at scores.sebi.gov.in. Attach all supporting documents.
SEBI typically targets resolution within 30 days.
Step 4: Register a Complaint in Smart ODR
If SCORES does not bring resolution, take your matter to the Smart ODR platform.
This enables structured online dispute resolution, including conciliation and arbitration, without lengthy legal proceedings.
Step 5: Arbitration in Share Market
For disputes involving fee recovery or compensation for specific advisory conduct, arbitration through the applicable exchange mechanism offers a formal adjudicated route.
Note that recovery is not always guaranteed; the outcome depends heavily on the evidence you have and the specific nature of your case.
Need Help?
If you are unsure about how to move forward, you do not have to handle this alone.
Register with us, and we will assess your case, organise the necessary evidence, and support you at every step, from drafting your complaint to guiding you through arbitration if needed.
Conclusion
Is Supreme Investrade safe? The answer is not a simple yes or no, but the evidence laid out in this blog should give every trader serious pause before subscribing.
Supreme Investrade holds a SEBI registration, but a registration number is only the starting point. It tells you a firm is allowed to operate, not that it will treat your money with honesty and care.
Two SEBI adjudication orders in a single year, penalties for sharing misleading profit screenshots, pressuring loss-making clients to deposit more funds, and even tampering with a genuine SEBI complaint; these are not minor slip-ups. They are a pattern.
If you are considering Supreme Investrade or any research analyst firm, do yourself one favour before paying anything: check their enforcement history on SEBI’s official website, read the actual orders, and ask hard questions.
Your capital deserves better than a polished website and a convincing WhatsApp message.
